first_img Read more… At issue is “Science and Technology for America’s Oceans: A Decadal Vision,” which succeeds a framework first released in 2007 during the administration of George W. Bush.The 10-year plan from the council, an interagency panel led by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), is intended to guide agencies in developing budgets and directing research. Representatives from the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other government agencies worked on the language.”Carrying out the research goals will require investments in and coordination of ocean science and technology across all levels of government and private industry, academia and nongovernmental organizations,” the executive summary states.The same summary sets five overarching goals, none of which mentions warming. The broader report mentions climate and impacts such as rising sea levels and acidification but does not have a separate goal on the issue with tied priorities. It removes earlier language about human-caused warming. Instead, mentions of climate are sprinkled within chapters such as “maritime security” and “economic prosperity.”The original 2007 ocean plan had a separate section titled “the ocean’s role in climate,” with three accompanying research priorities. One of those was “understanding of the ocean to help project future climate changes.””The ocean is getting warmer, more freshwater is being added by melting ice sheets, and more CO2 is being absorbed from the atmosphere,” the Bush-era document said.The 2013 update from the Obama administration expanded on the link between oceans and climate change with statements such as “anthropogenic greenhouse gas-induced global warming” contributes to the decline of Arctic sea ice.For Trump critics, the report is the latest signal of intent to slash budgets for climate programs and align with the views of climate skeptics. They point to actions such as an executive order this summer revising U.S. ocean policy that axed Obama language on climate and focused more on economic and security concerns.”Everything we do in the ocean now is affected by climate change. You need to research the impacts of climate change across all of these chapters,” said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists in Cambridge, Massachusetts.As one example, he said discussing expanded seafood production, as the report does, without specific ties to human-driven climate change is “nonsensical,” considering the effect of warming on a range of ocean species.A former government official not authorized to speak to the press said the scientific community, including many federal scientists, is feeling “bruised” by the lack of a climate chapter.There have been other instances of the Trump administration removing climate change from guidance documents on federal research (Greenwire, 2 August).It’s unclear who made the decision to take out a specific chapter and research goal, but administration officials involved in the plan say it is intended to reflect President Trump’s priorities and present a more “integrated” approach.Technologies for mapping the ocean floor, for example, are useful for both modeling climate change and assessing energy exploration potential, according to officials.”When you read the report, it’s clear that far from being buried, climate change is addressed throughout. As the American people well know, our nation faces many issues. Climate change is one; so is global trade, economic growth, national security, education, and jobs,” said one White House official.Some outside groups praised the approach. In preliminary comments on the draft, the Consortium for Ocean Leadership in Washington, D.C., said it appreciated recognition of the concept of ocean security and a push for an educated “blue workforce.”Industry groups criticized the report for non-climate reasons. The National Ocean Industries Association in Washington, D.C., said in a statement that “while we are most supportive of the discussion of additional offshore wind resources and the potential of hydrates, the oversight of the importance of oil and natural gas presents a woefully inadequate picture of the ocean energy future.”Last year, OSTP eliminated multiple positions on climate change and the environment. At the time, officials said that much of the former climate work would continue even if sometimes housed under a different name (Greenwire, 4 August, 2017).The report seems to reflect that approach. References to climate in the new plan include a quote from the 2014 National Climate Assessment stating that “the United States has experienced more than 219 weather and climate disasters since 1980” and “a healthy, productive, and resilient ocean is inextricably linked to Earth’s climate and weather patterns.”In a section on maritime security, it discusses how “ocean acidification and warming” could contribute to less food security. Another section on “economic prosperity” calls for monitoring of rising sea levels.The report also highlights the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observation and Modeling project, which involves hundreds of robotic observation floats that play a role in assessing climate patterns.Administration officials note there is broader discussion of some areas such as “big data,” which recognizes the growth in computing power to analyze data from ocean sensors and advances in genetics.Yet many are skeptical, considering past budget requests and directives. Earlier this year, Trump proposed cutting NOAA’s budget by about a billion dollars, including programs aiming to help coastal communities and foster research on acidification.After the release last month of the newest National Climate Assessment, which issued dire warnings about warming impacts, Trump told The Washington Post that “as to whether or not it’s man-made and whether or not the effects that you’re talking about are there, I don’t see it.””It looks to me that they politically sanitized this [ocean report] for the White House perspective,” said Rosenberg.Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from E&E News. Copyright 2018. E&E provides essential news for energy and environment professionals at www.eenews.net Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Originally published by E&E NewsThe White House is no longer including a distinct chapter on climate change in an overarching plan setting federal priorities on ocean policy for a decade.The move by the National Science and Technology Council is angering environmentalists, although administration officials say they are presenting the issue in a different way and emphasizing new areas. Neville Nell/Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) By Christa Marshall, E&E NewsDec. 5, 2018 , 3:20 PMcenter_img Email Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Trump ocean plan axes climate chapterlast_img read more